The task was more difficult than we knew then, and my time has been limited. We’ve made lots of progress on the spec, we have some very high-quality implementations that are getting good use (including in industry), and hopefully we’re converging on something that could be called 1.0.
(Anyway, I take no responsibility for the wording that you quote: that was all @codinghorror!)
Considering that the original version of that sentence talked about “early 2016”, maybe there should be no indication of an ETA. But I’ll leave that to you.
I would suggest that instead of an ETA, the front page should
cite some accomplishments. E.g., implementations in N languages,
adoption of (extended) commonmark by GitHub, GitLab, Swift,
Qt, reddit (with some transitional compatibility quirks),
Discourse.