Agreed. This discussion about <div>
block syntax sounds related to Content Block/Inline Syntax
I haven’t seen any objection for fenced :::
as the <div>
block syntax. And I think it’s also a good candidate for fencing generic detectives that can fall back as normal content.
Since github does (where ‘ruby’ is a css class name I think):
```ruby
require 'redcarpet'
markdown = Redcarpet.new("Hello World!")
puts markdown.to_html
```
then a direct eqv using the spoiler example for div would be:
:::spoiler
spoiler content here
:::
to which we can prettify it like so (perhaps classnames should have no spacing):
:::::::spoiler::::::::
spoiler content here
::::::::::::::::::::::
What do you think about this approach @vitaly ?