# \[Proposal for the Site\] Other Categories

**URL:** <https://talk.commonmark.org/t/proposal-for-the-site-other-categories/547>\
**Category:** Meta\
**Created:** [September 10, 2014, 5:11pm UTC](https://talk.commonmark.org/t/proposal-for-the-site-other-categories/547 "2014-09-10T17:11:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![saddington](https://cdn.commonmark.org/user_avatar/talk.commonmark.org/saddington/32/353_2.png) [@saddington](https://talk.commonmark.org/u/saddington)\
**Post date:** [September 10, 2014, 5:11pm UTC](https://talk.commonmark.org/t/proposal-for-the-site-other-categories/547/1 "2014-09-10T17:11:02Z")

</div>

I’d love to have some other categories for this expanding site…

Some thoughts:

- Misc / Watercooler
- Products That Use CommonMark / Show & Tell
- Resources…?

Thoughts?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![codinghorror](https://cdn.commonmark.org/user_avatar/talk.commonmark.org/codinghorror/32/2_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://talk.commonmark.org/u/codinghorror)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2014, 4:41am UTC](https://talk.commonmark.org/t/proposal-for-the-site-other-categories/547/2 "2014-09-11T04:41:49Z")

</div>

Possibly but first we need to be able to point to a number of such topics that have no category.

I suggest creating the sort of topics you want to see here first and worry about deep categorization later (if at all, depending on how many topics of that type there end up being).

Basically, don’t prematurely ~~optim~~ categorize

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![saddington](https://cdn.commonmark.org/user_avatar/talk.commonmark.org/saddington/32/353_2.png) [@saddington](https://talk.commonmark.org/u/saddington)\
**Post date:** [September 11, 2014, 12:27pm UTC](https://talk.commonmark.org/t/proposal-for-the-site-other-categories/547/3 "2014-09-11T12:27:56Z")

</div>

great idea! will do.
