# MultiMarkdown Cross References

**URL:** <https://talk.commonmark.org/t/multimarkdown-cross-references/1915>\
**Category:** Spec\
**Created:** [November 19, 2015, 12:28am UTC](https://talk.commonmark.org/t/multimarkdown-cross-references/1915 "2015-11-19T00:28:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ToniWonKanobi](https://cdn.commonmark.org/user_avatar/talk.commonmark.org/toniwonkanobi/32/777_2.png) [@ToniWonKanobi](https://talk.commonmark.org/u/ToniWonKanobi)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2015, 1:21am UTC](https://talk.commonmark.org/t/multimarkdown-cross-references/1915/3 "2015-11-19T01:21:03Z")

</div>

[Again](http://talk.commonmark.org/t/multimarkdown-style-images/1917/3?u=toniwonkanobi), I can see the previous discussion. And again, sigh.

* * *

Your suggestion was, as far as I can see, a decent one—it’s basically the standard reference link syntax. That said, it _does_ add a bit of cruft that is not present in the MultiMarkdown implementation, specifically, the MMD implementation makes the Headers references _in and of themselves_, which is neat-o.

---

_[View the full topic](https://talk.commonmark.org/t/multimarkdown-cross-references/1915)._