Not sure whether this is caused by spec or the reference implementation, but the <img>
handling is inconsistent: it depends on whether the tag is closed, self-closing, or not closed.
See this dingus demo.
Not sure whether this is caused by spec or the reference implementation, but the <img>
handling is inconsistent: it depends on whether the tag is closed, self-closing, or not closed.
See this dingus demo.
This is consistent with the spec: see discussion at
But @glebm has raised a legitimate issue for discussion about whether the spec should give special treatment to void elements here:
(I’ll start a separate thread for discussion of this.)