# Highlights, Strikeout, Underlines, Spoilers

**URL:** <https://talk.commonmark.org/t/highlights-strikeout-underlines-spoilers/825>\
**Category:** Extensions\
**Created:** [October 18, 2014, 2:53pm UTC](https://talk.commonmark.org/t/highlights-strikeout-underlines-spoilers/825 "2014-10-18T14:53:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 24

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chrisalley](https://cdn.commonmark.org/user_avatar/talk.commonmark.org/chrisalley/32/906_2.png) [@chrisalley](https://talk.commonmark.org/u/chrisalley)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2014, 2:44am UTC](https://talk.commonmark.org/t/highlights-strikeout-underlines-spoilers/825/24 "2014-10-25T02:44:25Z")

</div>

> [@mofosyne](#):
>
> So we shall keep highlights, strikeouts, and spoilers, but no underlines. aye?

There are good use cases for spoilers and highlights, potentially strikethrough too.

I suggest this topic is closed since there are already individual topics for each and there is clearly no generic syntax. It is confusing to spread the discussion over multiple topics.

- [Spoilers](http://talk.commonmark.org/t/what-could-a-spoiler-tag-extension-look-like/767)
- [Strikethrough](http://talk.commonmark.org/t/strikeout-threw-out-strikethrough-strikes-out-throughout/820)
- [Highlights](http://talk.commonmark.org/t/highlighting-text-with-the-mark-element/840)
- [Underlines](http://talk.commonmark.org/t/feature-request-underline-text/343)

---

_[View the full topic](https://talk.commonmark.org/t/highlights-strikeout-underlines-spoilers/825)._