# Guide for syntax extensions

**URL:** <https://talk.commonmark.org/t/guide-for-syntax-extensions/193>\
**Category:** Spec\
**Created:** [September 4, 2014, 1:57am UTC](https://talk.commonmark.org/t/guide-for-syntax-extensions/193 "2014-09-04T01:57:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dajare](https://cdn.commonmark.org/user_avatar/talk.commonmark.org/dajare/32/30_2.png) [@dajare](https://talk.commonmark.org/u/dajare)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2014, 7:01am UTC](https://talk.commonmark.org/t/guide-for-syntax-extensions/193/3 "2014-09-04T07:01:03Z")

</div>

I’m just connecting a couple dots here - but this topic seems to relate to the suggestion that it woud be worth discussing [how best to include simple extensibility points for extensions](http://talk.commonmark.org/t/the-inevitable-markdownextra-topic/42/18?u=dajare).

As the core spec “settles”, the extensions will remain of keen interest to many, I’m confident.

---

_[View the full topic](https://talk.commonmark.org/t/guide-for-syntax-extensions/193)._