Editorial suggestion: add a links between 4.6 and 6.8

In 4.6, I think it would be nice if the first occurrence of “Raw HTML” was a link to 6.8.

Similarly, in 6.8, I think it’d be nice if there was some linked reference to 4.6, “HTML blocks”

This might be better served on GitHub as an issue.

Maybe this could have been clearer, but 4.6 is about block-level content (raw HTML blocks), and 6.8 is about inline-level content (raw HTML tags within, e.g., a paragraph). So a link between them might actually be misleading. Perhaps, instead, some text should be added clarifying what I just said above.

1 Like

Okay. Done. It’s https://github.com/jgm/CommonMark/issues/401

1 Like